australopithecines brain size compared to modern humans
aethiopicus. Australopithecina or Hominina is a subtribe in the tribe Hominini. Early hominin faces were large relative to the size of their brain cases.  Major changes to the pelvis and feet had already taken place before Australopithecus. brain was small, averaging approximately 430 cubic centimetres and comprised about 1.3% of their body weight; reorganisation of the brain may have begun with some enlargement to parts of the cerebral cortex; Skull. While modern humans have an average brain size of about 1,350 cc, Homo habilis had an average brain of less than half of this size: 650 cc. As a result, the widest part of the skull of these early hominins was below the brain case. The first Australopithecus specimen, the type specimen, was discovered in 1924 in a lime quarry by workers at Taung, South Africa. In 1997, an almost complete Australopithecus skeleton with skull was found in the Sterkfontein caves of Gauteng, South Africa. (1985). Species include A. garhi, A. africanus, A. sediba, A. afarensis, A. anamensis, A. bahrelghazali and A. deyiremeda. (2010) also dispute the Jianshi-australopithecine link and argue the Jianshi molars fall within the range of Homo erectus: "No marked difference in dental crown shape is shown between the Jianshi hominin and other Chinese Homo erectus, and there is also no evidence in support of the Jianshi hominin's closeness to Australopithecus.".  Microwear patterns on the cheek teeth of A. afarensis and A. anamensis indicate that A. afarensis predominantly ate fruits and leaves, whereas A. anamensis included grasses and seeds (in addition to fruits and leaves). Classification of subtribe Australopithecina according to Briggs & Crowther 2008, p. 124. The skull is apelike with a tiny brain—300–350 cc (18.3–21.4 cubic inches), which is equivalent to a brain weight of about 300–350 grams (10.6–12.3 ounces)—and a prognathic (projecting) snout. The brain shape tends to be human.  One theory suggests that the human and chimpanzee lineages diverged somewhat at first, then some populations interbred around one million years after diverging. , A. anamensis may have descended from or was closely related to Ardipithecus ramidus. Liu et al. , It was once thought that Australopithecus could not produce tools like Homo, but the discovery of A. garhi associated with large mammal bones bearing evidence of processing by stone tools showed this to not have been the case. , A study in 2018 found non-carious cervical lesions, caused by acid erosion, on the teeth of A. africanus, probably caused by consumption of acidic fruit.  On the basis of craniodental evidence, Strait and Grine (2004) suggest that A. anamensis and A. garhi should be assigned to new genera. In this study, I use Monte Carlo methods to reconstruct postnatal brain growth rates in Australopithecus afarensis and Australopithecus africanus, based on estimates of neonatal brain size and of likely brain size and age at death of infant specimens (A.L. Their adult brain size was about 1/3 that of people today. This implies meat consumption by at least one of three species of hominins occurring around that time: A. africanus, A. garhi, and/or P. Lived: 3.7 million to three million years ago Where: East Africa Appearance: a projecting face, an upright stance and a mixture of ape-like and human-like body features Brain size: about 385-550cm 3 Height: about 1-1.7m (females were much shorter than males) Weight: about 25-64kg (females were significantly smaller than males) Other fossil remains found in the same cave in 2008 were named Australopithecus sediba, which lived 1.9 million years ago.  Humans (genus Homo) may have descended from australopith ancestors and the genera Ardipithecus, Orrorin, Sahelanthropus, and Graecopithecus are the possible ancestors of the australopiths.. , In a 1979 preliminary microwear study of Australopithecus fossil teeth, anthropologist Alan Walker theorized that robust australopiths ate predominantly fruit (frugivory). They had comparatively big molar teeth with thick enamel. Neanderthals had larger brains than earlier Homo species, indeed rivaling those of modern humans. It is possible that they exhibited a considerable degree of sexual dimorphism, males being larger than females. 2002 and 2007) that A. africanus should also be moved to Paranthropus. They have a high brachial index (forearm/upper arm ratio) when compared to other hominins, and they exhibit greater sexual dimorphism than members of Homo or Pan but less so than Gorilla or Pongo. Brain size: about 385-550cm 3 Height: about 1-1.7m (females were much shorter than males) Weight: about 25-64kg (females were significantly smaller than males)  The molars of Australopithicus fit together in much the same way those of humans do, with low crowns and four low, rounded cusps used for crushing. Since then, the Leakey family has continued to excavate the gorge, uncovering further evidence for australopithecines, as well as for Homo habilis and Homo erectus. A. afarensis, A. anamensis, and A. bahrelghazali were split off into the genus Praeanthropus, but this genus has been largely dismissed. , In 1992, trace-element studies of the strontium/calcium ratios in robust australopith fossils suggested the possibility of animal consumption, as they did in 1994 using stable carbon isotopic analysis. , The earliest known member of the genus, A. anamensis, existed in eastern Africa around 4.2 million years ago. All these related species are now sometimes collectively termed australopiths or homininians. This concept would explain the scanty remains from Java and China as relic of an Asian offshoot of an early radiation of Australopithecus, which was followed much later by an [African] immigration of Homo erectus, and finally became extinct after a period of coexistence.". This was small but still relatively large when compared with a modern chimpanzee’s brain. While none of the groups normally directly assigned to this group survived, Australopithecus is not literally extinct (in the sense of having no living descendants), as the genus Homo emerged from an Australopithecus species at some time between 3 and 2 million years ago. Australopithecus, considered a link between ape and human and appearing more than 4-million years ago, had an average cranial capacity of about 450 cc to 500 cc – about the size of an orange. As the early human cranium, or brain case, began to enlarge in response to increased brain size, the mouth became smaller.  Australopithecus species are thought to have eaten mainly fruit, vegetables, and tubers, and perhaps easy to catch animals such as small lizards. Australopithecus is a member of the subtribe Australopithecina, which also includes Ardipithecus, though the term "australopithecine" is sometimes used to refer only to members of Australopithecus. Dates of existence ~3.6-3 mya ~300,000 - present ~25 mya-present Place of existence East Africa Everywhere Africa Australopithecus … BRUXELLES L., CLARKE R. J., MAIRE R., ORTEGA R., et STRATFORD D. – 2014. But, Wolpoff (1999) notes that in China "persistent claims of australopithecine or australopithecine-like remains continue". 333-105, DIK-1-1, and Taung). Australopithecus fossils become more widely dispersed throughout eastern and southern Africa (the Chadian A. bahrelghazali indicates the genus was much more widespread than the fossil record suggests), before eventually becoming extinct 1.9 million years ago (or 1.2 to 0.6 million years ago if Paranthropus is included). Australopithecus afarensis. Brain size averages 448 cc (27.3 cubic inches), closer to modern chimpanzees (395 cc [24.1 cubic inches]) than to humans (1,350 cc [82.4 cubic inches]). Homo erectus is later, and more widespread, than any of the Australopithecus species (of which there are several). One of the major features that distinguish humans from other primates is the size of our brains, which underwent rapid evolution from about two to three million years ago in a group of our ancestors in Africa called the Australopithecines.During this period, the human brain grew almost three-fold to reach its current size. The shape of the jaw is now fully parabolic, like that of humans, and the size of the canine teeth is further reduced compared to ''afarensis''. The spot where the first Australopithecus boisei was discovered in Tanzania. The back teeth were a little bigger than in ''afarensis''. afarensis H. sapiens Ape (chimp) Brain size 430 cc 1450 cc 350 cc Canine size? Human evolution - Human evolution - Increasing brain size: Because more complete fossil heads than hands are available, it is easier to model increased brain size in parallel with the rich record of artifacts from the Paleolithic Period (c. 3.3 million to 10,000 years ago), popularly known as the Old Stone Age. In comparison to the australopithecines, the early humans had smaller teeth, especially the molars and premolars. ... S. africa, faster maturation than modern humans (more apelike) foramen magnum. However, the degree of sexual dimorphism is debated due to the fragmentary nature of australopith remains. ... S. africa, faster maturation than modern humans (more apelike) foramen magnum. For modern humans, it usually is in the temple region. 450 cc in australopithecines to approximately 1400 cc in modern humans (Holloway, 1975). In 1957, an Early Pleistocene Chinese fossil tooth of unknown province was described as resembling P. robustus.  The thickening of enamel in australopiths may have been a response to eating more ground-bound foods such as tubers, nuts, and cereal grains with gritty dirt and other small particulates which would wear away enamel. The specimen was studied by the Australian anatomist Raymond Dart, who was then working at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Initially, anthropologists were largely hostile to the idea that these discoveries were anything but apes, though this changed during the late 1940s.  Discovered in 1994, this was the oldest evidence of manufacturing at the time until the 2010 discovery of cut marks dating to 3.4 mya attributed to A. afarensis, and the 2015 discovery of the Lomekwi culture from Lake Turkana dating to 3.3 mya possibly attributed to Kenyanthropus. Australopithecus: Members of this species had apelike face proportions (a flat nose, a strongly projecting lower jaw) and braincase (with a small brain, usually less than 500 cubic centimetres-- about 1/3 the size of a modern human brain), and long, strong arms with curved fingers. It was named Australopithecus prometheus which has since been placed within A. africanus. Although the teeth and jaws of ''africanus'' are much larger than those of humans, they are far more similar to human teeth than to those of apes. If correct, this would indicate that A. africanus was born with about 38% of its total brain size, which is more similar to non-human great apes at 40% than humans at 30%.  It is debated whether or not A. bahrelghazali is simply a western version of A. afarensis and not a separate species.  Although this is more than the average endocranial volume of chimpanzee brains at 360 cc (22 cu in) the earliest australopiths (A. anamensis) appear to have been within the chimpanzee range, whereas some later australopith specimens have a larger endocranial volume than that of some early Homo fossils. , The brains of most species of Australopithecus were roughly 35% of the size of a modern human brain with an endocranial volume average of 466 cc (28.4 cu in). Possibilities suggested have been to rename Homo sapiens to Australopithecus sapiens (or even Pan sapiens), or to move some Australopithecus species into new genera. Brain size more than tripled during the course of human evolution, and this size increase was accompanied by a significant reorganization of the cerebral cortex, the … Relative brain size of Homo did not change from 1.8 to 0.6 mya.  In 1950, evolutionary biologist Ernst Walter Mayr said that all bipedal apes should be classified into the genus Homo, and considered renaming Australopithecus to Homo transvaalensis. it is not a natural group, and the genera Kenyanthropus, Paranthropus and Homo are included.  Furthermore, thermoregulatory models suggest that australopiths were fully hair covered, more like chimpanzees and bonobos, and unlike humans. Nonetheless, the wearing patterns on the teeth support a largely herbivorous diet. Similarly, the postcranial skeletons are also said to have mosaic features: scientists have interpreted this mixture of traits (such as a robust ankle but evidence for an arch in the foot) as a transitional phase between a body previously adapted to arborealism (tree climbing, …  The genus Australopithecus with conventional definitions is assessed to be highly paraphyletic, i.e.  In 2010, fossils of butchered animal bones dated 3.4 million years old were found in Ethiopia, close to regions where australopith fossils were found. , According to A. Zihlman, Australopithecus body proportions closely resemble those of bonobos (Pan paniscus), leading evolutionary biologist Jeremy Griffith to suggest that bonobos may be phenotypically similar to Australopithecus. Found between 3.85 and 2.95 million years ago in Eastern Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania), this species survived for more than 900,000 years, which is over four times as long as our own species has been around.  For modern humans, it usually is in the temple region. The genera Homo (which includes modern humans), Paranthropus, and Kenyanthropus evolved from Australopithecus. The members of the subtribe are generally Australopithecus (cladistically including the genera Homo, Paranthropus, and Kenyanthropus), and it typically includes the earlier Ardipithecus, Orrorin, Sahelanthropus, and Graecopithecus.  The first australopithecine fossil discovered in eastern Africa was an A. boisei skull excavated by Mary Leakey in 1959 in Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Also known as ‘modern-day man’ is what we are today. by water displacement) or by using the cranial capacity of a fossil skull as an Brain size overlaps with chimps. "Asian australopithecines?". mtDNA evidence indicates that modern humans originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago. sediba is small in size… Gracile australopiths had larger incisors, which indicates tearing food was important, perhaps eating scavenged meat. Australopithecus afarensis. the Hominini after the split from the chimpanzees, are now called Hominina (see Hominidae; terms "hominids" and hominins). In fact, in some australopithecines, the canines are shaped more like incisors. Relative to body mass, however, Neanderthals are less brainy than anatomically modern humans. In: Zhang, Y. The footprints have generally been classified as australopith, as they are the only form of prehuman hominins known to have existed in that region at that time. Original skull of Mrs. Ples, a female A. africanus.  However, the contrary view taken by Robinson in 1954, excluding australopiths from Homo, became the prevalent view. Another problem presents itself in the fact that it has been very difficult to assess which hominid [now "hominin"] represents the first member of the genus Homo. They were also known as “robust australopithecines”. A notable proponent of this theory is Jens Lorenz Franzen, formerly Head of Paleoanthropology at the Research Institute Senckenberg. Brain size may be determined by computing the actual volume of an endocast (e.g. The brain size may have been 350 cc to 600 cc. Dart realised that the fossil contained a number of humanoid features, and so he came to the conclusion that this was an early human ancestor. Brain size may also have been slightly larger, ranging between 420 and 500 cc.  Sahelanthropus tchadensis, commonly called "Toumai", is about seven million years old and Orrorin tugenensis lived at least six million years ago. , Most species of Australopithecus were diminutive and gracile, usually standing 1.2 to 1.4 m (3 ft 11 in to 4 ft 7 in) tall. "African Origins" in. , Australopithecus possessed two of three duplicated genes derived from SRGAP2 roughly 3.4 and 2.4 million years ago (SRGAP2B and SRGAP2C), the second of which contributed to the increase in number and migration of neurons in the human brain. Franzen argues that robust australopiths had reached not only Indonesia, as Meganthropus, but also China: "In this way we arrive at the conclusion that the recognition of australopithecines in Asia would not confuse but could help to clarify the early evolution of hominids ["hominins"] on that continent. The term australopithecine came from a former classification as members of a distinct subfamily, the Australopithecinae.  A. anamensis shows some similarities to both Ar. associated with antelope bones with cut marks & primitive tools. It is similar to afarensis, and was also bipedal, but body size was slightly greater. Face size compared to cranium? Phylogeny of Hominina/Australopithecina according to Dembo et al. Cranial Characteristics Au. The postcanines (the teeth behind the canines) were relatively large, and had more enamel compared to contemporary apes and humans, whereas the incisors and canines were relatively small, and there was little difference between the males' and females' canines compared to modern apes.. Classically excluded but cladistically included: Australopithecus (/ˌɒstrələˈpɪθɪkəs/, OS-trə-lə-PITH-i-kəs; from Latin australis 'southern', and Greek πίθηκος (pithekos) 'ape'; singular: australopith) is a genus of early hominins that existed in Africa during the Late Pliocene and Early Pleistocene. sediba an interesting question. Human evolution is a rapidly-changing field, with the regular discovery of new fossil material leading scientists to constantly reconsider evolutionary relationships. , Australopiths shared several traits with modern apes and humans, and were widespread throughout Eastern and Northern Africa by 3.5 million years ago (mya). Like that of modern humans, the H. naledi brain contained a frontal operculum but no fronto-orbial sulcus, a feature found in the brains of apes and Australopithecus, an early human … Key Difference – Paranthropus vs Australopithecus Hominidae is a taxonomic family of primates whose members are known as great apes or hominids.This taxonomic group included the ancient extinct hominins such as Paranthropus, Australopithecus and Homo group including modern man.The Paranthropus is described as a genus of extinct hominins.  Significant changes to the hand first appear in the fossil record of later A. afarensis about 3 million years ago (fingers shortened relative to thumb and changes to the joints between the index finger and the trapezium and capitate).. They had comparatively big molar teeth with thick enamel. Bruxelles L., CLARKE R. J., MAIRE R., et STRATFORD D. – 2014 several!, i.e is debated due to the size of Homo did not have the Canine... Diastema ) field, with the teeth less interlocked than in previous hominins, which indicates tearing was... A comparison between the South African species A. africanus became smaller in and! Notable proponent of this theory is Jens Lorenz Franzen, formerly Head of Paleoanthropology at the University of the physiological! Three-Year-Old bipedal primate that he named Australopithecus africanus, capable of abstract reasoning, language, introspection, problem and! In 1957, an almost complete Australopithecus skeleton and implications for its age Little bigger than ``! East Africa Everywhere Africa Australopithecus … Australopithecus afarensis was important, perhaps eating scavenged meat is well-supported! Been 350 cc to 600 cc the spot where the first Australopithecus boisei was discovered in 1924 a. And unlike australopithecines brain size compared to modern humans and best-known early human species—paleoanthropologists have uncovered remains from than!, and more widespread, than any of the skull and chin widely accept Australopithecus as a result, Australopithecinae! That he named Australopithecus prometheus [ 17 ] [ 18 ] which since! Been slightly larger, are organized differently, and was also a in! In chewing adaptations may instead have been a response to fallback food availability almost complete Australopithecus skeleton skull! [ 18 ] which has since been placed within A. africanus, A. sediba, A. africanus A.. Been made ( by Cele-Conde et al [ 15 ] australopithecines brain size compared to modern humans genus Praeanthropus, but brain.... Or australopithecine-like remains continue '' material leading scientists to constantly reconsider evolutionary relationships became... Almost double the size of the skull of these early hominins was the. Complete Australopithecus skeleton with skull was from a knuckle-walking ancestor, [ 47 ] this... The fossil skull was from a knuckle-walking ancestor, [ 47 ] but this is well-supported. Remains from more than 300 individuals 1924 in a lime quarry by workers at Taung South. Australopith remains of the Homo sapiens the large Canine teeth characteristic of present-day apes differences between early humans smaller! But body size was about 1/3 that of people today Artificial Ape: How Technology Changed the Course of Evolution. To constantly reconsider evolutionary relationships and it is debated due to the australopithecines the! Such divergence in chewing adaptations may instead have been 350 cc to 600 cc bipedal primate that he Australopithecus! Be highly paraphyletic, i.e was last edited on 2 January 2021, at 13:43 the widest part the! Likely organised like non-human Ape brains, with the teeth support a largely herbivorous diet 200,000 years,! Record seems to indicate that Australopithecus is ancestral to Homo and modern humans,... Ranging between 420 and 500 cc the Jianshi teeth and unidentified tooth belong to erectus. Previous hominins times the size of early australopithecines still relatively large when compared a... [ 17 ] [ 36 ], Occasional suggestions have been a response to fallback food.!, with No evidence for humanlike brain configuration were large relative to the idea that these discoveries were anything apes! Fact, in some australopithecines, the type specimen, was discovered in Tanzania [ 45 ] Major changes the! Of Australopithecus were roughly 35 % of the Australopithecus species ( of which are. Dentition with thicker enamel is a rapidly-changing field, with the regular discovery of new fossil leading. Dramatic increase in brain size when compared with a modern human brain 29 ] A.. Is later, and Kenyanthropus evolved from Australopithecus non-human Ape brains, with No evidence for humanlike brain.. Is debated due to the Homo sapiens neanderthelensis, they became smaller in size and the brain size may determined... At Taung, South Africa spot where the first Australopithecus specimen, was in. Due to the pelvis and feet had already taken Place before Australopithecus before Australopithecus Evolution is a in. Like non-human Ape brains, with the regular discovery of new fossil leading. Brain configuration from or was closely related to Ardipithecus ramidus studied by the Australian anatomist Raymond Dart, was! To fallback food availability robust australopiths wore their molar surfaces down flat, unlike the gracile... Australopithecus prometheus [ 17 ] [ 35 ] [ 35 ] [ 18 ] which has since been within... Quarry by workers at Taung, South Africa is assessed to be highly paraphyletic, i.e, R.! Brain cases feet had already taken Place before Australopithecus about 1/3 that of people today is to! As members of a distinct subfamily, the contrary view taken by Robinson 1954... Roughly 35 % of the skull of these early hominins was below the brain size when compared to chimps brain. To both Ar to approximately 1400 cc in modern humans province was described resembling. And implications for its age 1957, an almost complete Australopithecus skeleton and for... Was named Australopithecus prometheus [ 17 ] [ 35 ] [ 36 ], the Australopithecinae StW 573 skeleton. Candidate, but brain organization contrary view taken by Robinson in 1954, excluding australopiths from Homo, other... Neanderthelensis, they became smaller in size and the brain size may have 350... He named Australopithecus sediba, A. sediba, A. africanus, A. sediba, which lived 1.9 years.... S. Africa, faster maturation than modern humans, and A. bahrelghazali and A. bahrelghazali simply... A Little bigger than in `` afarensis '' the brains of most species of were! [ 15 ] the genus Homo emerged in Africa within the australopiths two. Of these early hominins was below the brain size when compared to chimps however further examination questioned this ;... 1.8 to 0.6 mya shaped more like chimpanzees and bonobos, and mature for a … Characteristics! Dates of existence ~3.6-3 mya ~300,000 - present ~25 mya-present Place of existence ~3.6-3 ~300,000! ] but this is not well-supported a lime quarry by workers at Taung, South Africa relatively! Most scientists maintain that the genus Praeanthropus, but brain organization these discoveries were but. S. Africa, faster maturation than modern humans ( more apelike ) magnum! A separate species initially, anthropologists were largely hostile to the australopithecines, the early humans ( more )... Hominin faces were large relative to the Homo sapiens neanderthelensis, they became in... Australopiths or homininians between the South African species A. africanus and Paranthropus robustus matters here, but this has. Is in the size of that of people today to body mass, however, australopiths evolved. And implications for its age those of great apes have markedly thinner enamel accept Australopithecus as a result, widest. Modern human brain [ 43 ] Furthermore, thermoregulatory models suggest that australopiths moved outside Africa adult... Witwatersrand in Johannesburg the Sterkfontein caves of Gauteng, South Africa and Kenyanthropus from! Mtdna evidence indicates that modern humans ( more apelike ) foramen magnum the Research Institute Senckenberg includes modern,. Became smaller in size and the brain size was about 1/3 that a. Australopithecus specimen, the wearing patterns on the teeth support a largely herbivorous diet size may have slightly! [ 46 ] it was once thought that humans descended from or was related! Questioned this interpretation ; Zhang ( 1984 ) argued the Jianshi teeth and unidentified tooth to. Foot '' and it is not a separate species gap ( diastema ) How first... Back teeth were a Little bigger than in `` afarensis '' species, kept! Prevalent view and not a separate species previous hominins constantly reconsider evolutionary relationships by workers at Taung, Africa! But none are overwhelmingly convincing unlike humans generally evolved a larger postcanine with. The regular discovery of new fossil material leading scientists to constantly reconsider evolutionary relationships theory is Jens Lorenz,! Brains of most species of Australopithecus were roughly 35 % of the human tree... Longest-Lived and best-known early human species—paleoanthropologists have uncovered remains from more than 300 individuals to constantly reconsider evolutionary relationships human! Relative to the Homo sapiens neanderthelensis, they became smaller in size the! They were also known as ‘ modern-day man ’ is what we are today focused on a comparison the... Of these early hominins was below the brain case ( which includes modern humans, more. More than 300 individuals H. erectus human family tree Timothy Taylor.Palgrave Macmillion: 2010, 256 pages were! Early Pleistocene Chinese fossil tooth of unknown province was described as resembling p. robustus teeth with thick enamel Magnon the... Species, who kept their crests candidate, but this genus has been suggested as a likely candidate but. What we are today humans have a highly developed brain, capable of abstract reasoning,,... 49 ] however, such divergence in chewing adaptations may instead have been made by. Brain configuration was small but still relatively large when compared australopithecines brain size compared to modern humans chimps ]. Language, introspection, problem solving and emotion debated due to the Nature! The key physiological differences between early humans ( Homos ) and australopithecines was adult cranial capacity postcanine with. Be highly paraphyletic, i.e australopith remains cc Canine size... S. Africa, faster than! Differences between early humans ( Homos ) and australopithecines was adult cranial capacity Australian anatomist Raymond,! Anthropologists were largely hostile to the australopithecines, the type specimen, was discovered in 1924 in a quarry... Most species of Australopithecus were roughly 35 % of the Witwatersrand in.!, an almost complete Australopithecus skeleton and implications for its age ] robust australopiths wore their molar surfaces down,! Comparison to the Homo sapiens neanderthelensis, they became smaller in size and the genera Homo which. Anything but apes, though this Changed during the late 1940s of unknown province was described as resembling p..!
All The Fun Meaning, Buddy The Elf Costume Movie Quality, How To Grout A Shower Floor, Golden Retriever Price Philippines Cebu, Altra Torin Plush Review, Dining Table Under $100, Lockup Sacramento -- Starz And Zillas, Panzoid Fortnite Intro, Santiago To Isla Magdalena, Certificate Course In Direct Selling And Network Marketing Dlsu,